This effort resulted in the federal community notification statute labeled "Megan's Law". While records indicate that Arizona had laws regarding sex offender registration as early as , never before has so much emphasis been focused on the sex offender population. When this occurs, the respective county adult probation agency or Arizona Department of Corrections DOC is required to enter information about the offender into a statewide accessible database. One portion of this information involves the sex offender risk assessment.
The risk assessment is a screening tool designed to provide criminal justice practitioners with the ability to predict a sex offender's risk of recidivism. The Arizona risk assessment evaluates nineteen different criteria that have been identified by treatment experts as good predictors of future behavior. Each criterion is evaluated and assigned a point value, which ultimately is totaled for recommending an appropriate community notification level of 1, 2, or 3.
Although probation agencies and DOC provide law enforcement agencies with a recommended community notification level, the local law enforcement agency may choose to complete its own risk assessment to ensure accuracy. This includes notification to the "surrounding neighborhood, area schools, appropriate community groups and prospective employers.
The notification shall include a flyer with a photograph and exact address of the offender as well as a summary of the offender's status and criminal background. A press release and a level two or three flyer shall be given to the local electronic and print media to enable information to be placed in a local publication. Successful community notification is dependent upon three factors: communication, education, and a zero tolerance approach to harassment or vigilantism.
Often the public does not understand how or why a sex offender is moving into their neighborhood. As such, it is the responsibility of all appropriate criminal justice agencies to engage in a collaborative effort to provide accurate and meaningful information to the public. To facilitate this exchange of information, many law enforcement agencies conduct public meetings and attend "Block Watch" meetings to answer questions and relieve fears.
Finally, a zero tolerance approach regarding harassment and vigilantism reinforces the true meaning of community notification: to empower the public with knowledge that can be used to protect themselves and their families from becoming victims. This is the date that Arizona implemented the community notification laws. Any person released from jail, prison, or sentenced to probation on or after this date is subject to community notification.
- Result Filters;
- phone reverse look up find unlisted cell phone number.
Additionally, any person convicted prior to June 1, , may be subject to community notification after completion of a risk assessment by a law enforcement agency. Prior to an offender's release or sentence to probation, the agency that had custody of the individual completes a risk assessment screening profile. This instrument evaluates nineteen criteria that are considered to be significant factors contributing to sex offender recidivism. Each criterion is given a score, which is then totaled to arrive at the recommended risk level. All criminal justice agencies must use the standardized Arizona Risk Assessment, however, occasionally law enforcement discovers information which can affect an offender's risk level.
Sex Offender Community Notification
As such, law enforcement is given the discretion to either accept the recommended risk level or complete another risk assessment. No, each state has slightly different community notification laws, implementation dates, and risk assessment instruments. In Arizona, all sex offenders classified as "predator" are housed at the State Hospital. Once an offender completes his sentence and is scheduled for release, the offender may be reviewed for violent sexual predator criteria.
Sex Offender Compliance
If it is determined that the offender is a violent sexual predator, Arizona law provides for a civil commitment to the Arizona State Hospital. The sex offender may request an annual review to determine if he is eligible for release into society, at which time the label "predator" is removed. The county sheriff is responsible for registering sex offenders living within their county.
Yes, if you are planning on staying in Arizona for more than 10 days. Failure to comply is a Class 4 Felony. The offender has 72 hours, excluding weekends and legal holidays, to complete a change of address. This must be completed in person, on a sex offender registration form.
Search and Statistics
Yes, judges have the authority to court order sex offender registration if there was a finding of sexual motivation. Although registration is mandatory for adults, it is not for juveniles. If a juvenile is adjudicated delinquent of an act that would require an adult to register, the court can require the juvenile to register until the age of twenty-five.
Community notification laws may apply if ordered by the court. Yes, all sex offenders are required to obtain a credential from the MVD. The credential which is obtained annually, looks identical to any other license except when a law enforcement official checks the status of the credential it indicates that the individual is subject to sex offender registration.
It is incumbent upon the user to contact the court in the "convicting jurisdiction" to gain access to these public documents. Some sex offenders are prohibited from living close to schools or child care facilities.
"The Cost of Fear: An Analysis of Sex Offender Registration, Community " by Kate Hynes
Information concerning such restrictions can be found in A. They can be male or female, rich or poor, employed or unemployed, religious or non-religious, educated or uneducated and from any race. They win a child's trust and then take advantage of that trust. They provide extra assistance and offer special attention.
All 50 states are mandated to maintain Internet websites containing sex offender registration information. Community notification statutes have been challenged on issues related to rights to privacy as well as their constitutionality. In the fall of , the U. Supreme Court heard two cases challenging Megan's Law. The Court upheld the constitutionality of a Connecticut statute allowing sex offenders to be identified on an Internet registry without first holding a hearing to determine their dangerousness to the community "Connecticut Dept.
Doe," In an Alaska case, the Court ruled that registration and notification of offenders sentenced before the law went into effect did not constitute ex post facto punishment "Smith v. The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers has developed a set of recommendations that we believe will facilitate that the original goal of registration and notification - enhanced community safety - is met in an effective manner. The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers ATSA believes that whenever possible development and implementation of social policies should be based on research.
It should be noted that to date, few research studies about community notification have been conducted. The research that has been completed is mixed and does not consistently conclude that community notification reduces recidivism, prevents sex crimes, protects children, or enhances community safety.
Importantly, the states e. MN, WA where community notification has appeared to demonstrate some effectiveness utilize empirically derived risk assessment procedures and publicly identify only high risk offenders. ATSA strongly supports sex offenders being held responsible for their crimes. When sex offenders are living in the community, it is imperative they be monitored and reintegrated carefully through effective legal supervision and treatment.
Therefore ATSA offers the following recommendations for implementation of registration and notification based on existing research about the assessment and management of sex offenders:. Registration and notification laws have received widespread support, largely due to the perception that the vast majority of sex offenders will repeat their crimes.
Though official recidivism rates underestimate true reoffense rates because not all criminals are apprehended , research studies by the US Dept. Certain sub-groups, such as pedophiles who molest boys, and rapists of adult women, seem to present the greatest risk over longer term periods. Despite recent data suggesting that contemporary cognitive-behavioral offender treatments can in fact reduce recidivism, early studies indicating that treatment was not successful in helping adult sex offenders have also led to a heightened fear. Public safety can be enhanced, and limited resources used more efficiently, when the most active notification practices are reserved for those offenders who are at highest risk to reoffend sexually and therefore require the most intensive interventions.
The ability to predict sexual dangerousness has improved markedly over the past decade as a result of studies identifying risk factors for violent and sexual recidivism. Procedures and instruments for assessing risk have been developed and refined, and risk for sex offense recidivism can be estimated with moderate accuracy. By classifying offenders into risk groups based on the existence of known risk factors, communities may be able to more accurately identify those sex offenders who pose the greatest threat to public safety.
At the same time, differential notification strategies can improve cost-effectiveness. Risk level systems might also decrease some of the negative effects of community notification on lower risk offenders. In fact, many states have decided that to minimize disrupting the stability of low risk offenders in ways that may increase their risk they will only notify the public about offenders who pose a high risk to offend.
Given the serious implications of decisions based on risk assessments, these assessment tools should always be administered by skilled, trained, and supervised professionals. The Adam Walsh Act requires states to move to an offense based classification system, whereby registered sex offenders are categorized according to the severity of their crime of conviction. Such schemes may inadvertently inflate the risk of some offenders while erroneously de-emphasizing the risk of those who plea-bargained to less severe crimes.